• Sign in

  • Join for free
  • Home
  • News
  • About
    • The ODYSSEA Team
    • Sponsors
    • Collaborators
  • Projects
    • Events
    • Past Projects
    • Research and Conservation
  • Support Us
  • Publications
  • Photos
  • Contact
ODYSSEA

Search

    • en
    • fr
  • info@odyssea.lu
0
ODYSSEA
  • Menu
  • Home
  • News
  • About
    • The ODYSSEA Team
    • Sponsors
    • Collaborators
  • Projects
    • Events
    • Past Projects
    • Research and Conservation
  • Support Us
  • Publications
  • Photos
  • Contact

Tag : Overfishing

Home » Tagged "Overfishing"
  • Odysse_RD_cover
    19November

    Researchers’ Days 2024

    We look on back on an inspiring time at the Researchers’ Days 2024! We had the privilege of engaging with a high number of attendees—ranging from eager secondary school students to passionate public visitors—on the importance of sustainable fishing and marine conservation.

    For many centuries, it was assumed that the ocean was so vast and its resources so abundant that it would be impossible to ever exhaust its bounty fully or significantly impact its ecosystems through human activity. However, with increasingly advanced fishing technologies—such as massive nets, trawling systems, longlines, and sonar—entire fish populations have been severely depleted, pushing several species to the brink of extinction. These methods, while efficient for maximising catches, often capture unintended species (bycatch) and damage delicate marine habitats, amplifying the stress on already vulnerable ecosystems.

    Luxembourg’s per capita fish consumption is among the highest in Europe. Yet many people remain unaware that the fishing industry poses one of the most significant threats to marine life today. To help bridge this knowledge gap, we developed interactive activities that introduce participants to various fishing methods—such as trawling, longlining, and pole lining—while highlighting the challenges involved in achieving sustainable fishing practices.

    We’d like to extend our heartfelt THANK YOU to everyone who stopped by our booth, participated in our activities, and asked thoughtful questions. Your enthusiasm and willingness to learn reaffirm our commitment to raising awareness and promoting solutions for a more sustainable future. We also thank the Luxembourg National Research Fund for organising this event and supporting Odyssea.

    Although Luxembourg is landlocked, the interest shown by so many in protecting our oceans highlights the power of collective action and shared responsibility. Together, we can work toward creating a more sustainable future for marine ecosystems everywhere.

    WhatsApp Image 2024-11-28 at 17.56.39 (3)
    WhatsApp Image 2024-11-28 at 17.56.39
    WhatsApp Image 2024-11-28 at 17.56.16
    WhatsApp Image 2024-11-29 at 12.05.45
    WhatsApp Image 2024-11-29 at 12.05.45 (1)
    WhatsApp Image 2024-11-28 at 17.56.18
    WhatsApp Image 2024-11-28 at 17.56.38
  • caughtfish
    02May

    The Tragedy of the Commons

    Fisheries regulations within the EU

    This article is part of a series on Fisheries. For a comprehensive overview of the impact of overfishing on marine ecosystems read The Hidden Costs of Seafood.

    At this point most of us are aware that we are probably fishing a lot more than what we should but what is the actual impact of our eating habits? As of 2018, two thirds of the world’s fisheries have collapsed, meaning they are fished to the point they cannot recover, depriving local communities of their income and food source. Collapsed fisheries also have major implications on the entire ecosystem affecting larger fish, seabirds and marine mammals.

    Concern over fisheries sustainability is not a novel concept. The United Nations held its first Conference on the Laws of the Sea back in 1958 which led to the adoption of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) in 1982. UNCLOS came about after centuries of complete fishing freedom and it constitutes the most comprehensive set of international regulations on marine governance. Its creation has been monumental as it was the first time that international law perceived marine resources as finite.

    FAO, 2018
    FAO, 2018

    Within the EU, fisheries are managed according to the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) first introduced in the 1970s. Its main aim is to regulate the exploitation of this common resource in order to ensure long term sustainability and fair access for everyone. Under the CFP, each country’s exclusive economic zone (EEZ) is shared between member states creating a unified fishing fleet. This fleet is managed under several measures including:

    • Total Allowable Catches (TACs) which set the maximum amount of fish that can be landed from particular areas
    • Gear regulations which ensure the banning of destructive fishing practices and improve gear selectivity to reduce bycatch
    • Minimum allowable size for each species
    • Closed areas and seasonal closures whereby fishing is banned in some areas
    • Limiting Capacity of fleet to reduce fishing pressure

    Established measures are based on fish stocks assessments conducted by the Council for the Exploration of the Seas (ICES). ICES is responsible for  providing scientific advice to the European Commission which in turn produces guidelines for its member states. Proposed measures are discussed and agreed upon on the national level. Also we should remember that there is a great difference in the impact between commercial, small scale, and recreational fishers and they should not be regarded as a single group.

    Med travel Centre 2018
    Med travel Centre 2018
    Marine Insight 2018
    Marine Insight 2018

    Even though the CFP is the main legal instrument to manage EU fish stocks it has been heavily critiqued due to its failure to deliver the expected results. Fish stocks continue to dwindle and efforts to minimise fishing fleets have failed due to a number of reasons:

    • As it is often the case, when scientific advice is undergoing the political process of legislation it is watered down or dismissed as alarmist instead of it being the backbone of regulations. As a result, TACs are often set much higher than the recommended amount. To illustrate that in 2002, the ICES recommended a complete cessation of cod fishing in the North Sea due to fishery collapse. After passing through the various stages of regulation setting, it was finally agreed upon to reduce the TAC by 45% and limit fishing effort. As a reaction to the dismissal of scientific evidence fisheries scientists interest has been largely directed away from management related research.
    • Implementation of measures is exceptionally slow. Approval and rolling out of regulations can be very lengthy leading to continuation of excessive fishing in areas already known to be fragile.
    • Law enforcement is weak due to the inaccessibility of the marine environment. Additionally, there is a strong resistance from fishers to abide by regulations, mainly due to economic necessity and mere impracticality of regulations. For example, the TACs system and size regulations has fishers discarding large amounts of dead fish back into the sea generating a whole new problem. The tragedy of the commons comes into play whereby no individual user of a common resource is willing to reduce their own personal exploitation due to the fear that someone else will take their share. Even though fishers are often aware that regulations are for the long term sustainability of the stocks the immediate economic gain often drives illegal fishing.
    • Lack of political will due to electoral politics. Politicians are unlikely to enforce measures that will render them unpopular with the fishing lobby as they are jeopardising their future re-election. Difficulties in implementation can result from the EU being a coalition of countries with different legal and administrative structures. Thus, policies can be a ‘’better fit’’ for some countries while posing great difficulty in others.
    • CFP subsidies often go towards funding fishing fleets greatly contributing to overfishing. This has led to a growth of the fishing fleet and an expansion of the fishing range directly contributing to the depletion of these already overfished resources.

    As sustainability of the sector depends on the health of biodiversity, it is crucial that regulations are constantly reviewed and updated in light of new findings. Through this process it is hoped that their effectiveness will be improved.

    Proto Thema 2016
    Proto Thema 2016

    References

    The European Union and Fishing Subsidies

    The new Common Fisheries Policy: sustainability in depth What? How?

    The rules in force | Fisheries

    Reflections on the Common Fisheries Policy

    Designed for failure: A critique of the Common Fisheries Policy of the European Union

    International fisheries relations | Fact Sheets on the European Union

    Article written by Venetia Galanaki.

  • Source: Pixabay
    01May

    The Complicated Story of Shark Exploitation

    Happy Sharks = Healthy Oceans

    As the ocean’s top predators, sharks provide us with many often overlooked ecosystem services. Perhaps most importantly they help maintain the diversity and abundance of marine species. They do this by keeping populations of lower predatory species in check; thereby ensuring lower trophic levels are not overexploited. It may be counter-intuitive but in this way, the presence of top predators like sharks actually promotes healthy fisheries and helps ensure sustainable exploitation of fish over the long term. Sharks are responsible for keeping other aspects of the marine food web in check as well. For example, they enjoy a diverse diet allowing them to target one prey item when it is in high abundance and shift to alternate prey items when a given population becomes reduced. They prevent herbivorous fish from overeating vegetation, provide essential food sources for scavengers, and remove sick or weak prey. All these services help maintain the health of our oceans.  Therefore ensuring our continued benefit of ocean resources like fisheries and oxygen production.

    Examples of ecosystem consequences from reduced shark populations

    Infographic explaining that when shark populations are reduced, seals overpopulate and fish populations are reduced
    Source: lilywilliamsart.com
    Infographic demonstrating that sharks help regulate fish populations by removing sick or weak prey
    Shark infographic demonstrating that when sharks disappear stingrays overpopulate resulting in a reduction in shellfish

    Despite all sharks do for our oceans, we continue to kill millions of these crucial animals each year.  Shark exploitation is a complicated story, often polarized by cruel practices like shark finning. Unfortunately, the issue extends far past solely shark finning and includes exploitation for other reasons including the use of shark liver, meat, cartilage and skin. We must address disrespectful and wasteful practices like shark finning but a more holistic approach that includes other forms of shark exploitation must also be considered in order to ensure the effective protection of our ocean’s top predators.

    Shark Finning

    Shark finning is the cruel practice where the fins of an individual are removed and the body is thrown back into the ocean, likely dead or dying. The practice is not only cruel but also extremely wasteful as only a small portion of the animal is actually consumed. Asian markets where shark fin soup is in high demand due to its association with wealth comprise the primary market for shark fins.

    Source: www.change.org
    Source: www.change.org

    Shark in Cosmetics???

    Shark liver oil, also known as, squalene or squalane is commonly used in cosmetic products, some supplements, natural health remedies, and vaccines. The vast majority of its use, however, is driven by the cosmetics industry. Shark based squalene (and its derivative, squalane) are often used in sunscreen, foundation, skin moisturizers, lipstick, eye makeup, and many other products due to moisturizing, anti-wrinkle, and restorative properties. A plant-based derivative does exist and some cosmetics brands have committed to its use; however, inconsistent or nonexistent labelling regulations by region mean that the source of squalene is often unclear to consumers.

    Shark Meat

    The market for shark meat has been steadily increasing according to the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. This growth is driven by multiple factors. First, the demand for wild fish remains high while the potential for exploitation of wild fish populations is limited. Consumer demand for wild-caught fish, therefore, drives a large portion of the demand for shark meat. Shark meat is often labelled under misleading names to encourage consumer purchase and eliminate the stigma around buying shark products. Check out sharkwater.com for a list of commonly used names for shark meat. Some that you may have encountered already include Rock Salmon, Whitefish, or Lemon fish. Another factor contributing to the growth of the shark meat market is the widespread implementation of finning regulations that require the fins to be naturally attached to the carcass when the shark is landed. These regulations have potentially prompted the development of shark meat markets and simultaneously made shark conservation efforts drastically more complicated. Of course ‘fins naturally attached’ policies are extremely beneficial in eliminating the cruel practice of shark finning; however, they need to be coupled with other fisheries regulations to ensure the sustainable use of sharks.

    Spiny dogfish in fishing net
    Source: www.undercurrentnews.com

    What's the solution?

    The multi-faceted exploitation of sharks does not come with a one size fits all solution. Instead, there are a few key changes that scientists are calling for to ensure shark populations are maintained at healthy levels into the future. For one, improved data collection and recording is essential to inform policy and regulations. The globalized nature of the shark products industry means that catch data are inconsistent across regions. This makes accurate analysis of utilization and trade very difficult. Regulations and policies will only be as good as the data that inform them so improved reporting will go a long way towards improved shark conservation. Other recommendations include improved trade monitoring, standardization of trade and fisheries management systems globally, and supporting legal and sustainable fisheries. To learn more about these international policy recommendations check out this report by the FAO.

    Poster to change shark finning laws. Explains that humans kill many more sharks than sharks do humans.
    Source: www.wildaid.org

    What can you do about it?

    Many changes are needed on international and national scales regarding fisheries regulations; however, there are meaningful actions that individuals can take. Here are a few:

    • Support local petitions! Many local NGOs, conservation organizations, or citizen-led groups create petitions that put pressure on local governments to change shark exploitation laws. A quick Google search will find current petitions on the issue in your area. Because of the widespread nature of shark exploitation, it’s important that national and regional governments worldwide begin to make positive changes for shark conservation. If no petition exists in your region start your own!
    • Educate yourself about hidden shark products in your favourite cosmetic brands: read here for more information, look at the ingredients lists on your cosmetics, and contact your favourite brands to see if they are using shark based squalene or squalane in any of their products. If the answer turns out to be yes put pressure on them to switch to a plant-based alternative.
    • Write a letter to a cosmetics brand that is using squalene or squalane in their products and urge them to switch to a plant-based alternative.
    • When buying seafood, be weary of commonly used names for shark and avoid buying these products. Here is a list of some of the most common names.
    • Take the shark free pledge!

    About the author: Kianna is currently a master’s student studying global ocean change. She is from the very landlocked city of Edmonton, Canada but discovered her love of the oceans through diving. She has worked on various conservation and research projects including cetacean monitoring, coral conservation, and as a scientific divemaster.

  • Colourful fishing nets
    10February

    The Hidden Costs of Seafood

    Article by Kianna Gallagher.

    “But do you still eat fish?” Aside from the scenario where I’m stranded on a desert island and only have meat as a food source, this question about our fishy friends is one of the most common questions regarding my diet. I decided long ago that given my stance on environmental issues a vegan or vegetarian diet was the way to go. It was always a bit puzzling; however, why fish did not seem to naturally fall into the category of ‘meat’ for a lot of people. They are animals after all!

    Continue reading The Hidden Costs of Seafood →

© 2025 ODYSSEA ASBL
  • Home
  • About
  • News
  • Contact